Skip to main content

SEO Specialist

How do you balance writing for readers with optimising for search engines when the two seem to pull in different directions?

TechnicalAny levelTests: On-page & content optimisation
Drill this questionCreate a free account to answer out loud with Ava and get feedback.

What the interviewer is looking for

  • This question tests on-page & content optimisation. Describes improving titles, headings, internal links and content depth to match intent, while keeping the page genuinely useful for readers.
  • Strong answers: Puts reader usefulness first, uses keywords naturally in key places, and collaborates with writers rather than forcing terms.
  • Likely follow-up: Can you give an example where you changed your recommendation after a writer pushed back?

Another way it may be asked: A writer says your keyword suggestions make the article awkward. How do you find a balance?

A structure to follow: Answer, explain, example, limits

  1. Step 1

    Answer

    Give your direct answer in the first sentence so the interviewer knows where you are going.

  2. Step 2

    Explain

    Say how it works or why you would do it that way, in plain words before jargon.

  3. Step 3

    Example

    Anchor it in something you have actually done or seen, with the detail that shows hands-on experience.

  4. Step 4

    Limits

    Say when your approach would not be the right one. It shows judgement.

This is guidance on shape, not a script. Use your own real experience and facts; never invent details to fill a gap. See the STAR guide and answer frameworks.

Common slips

  • Reciting a definition without showing you have applied it.
  • Using terms you cannot explain if asked a level deeper.
  • Claiming experience beyond what you can discuss in detail.

How to practise it

Say the answer in 90 seconds, then answer the follow-up as if it were a new question.

Browse all questions

How do you balance writing for readers with optimising for search engines when the two ... | How to answer